Confronting Ignorance: Hope for a More Reasonable World

The fate of our world, our sun, and the galaxy.

April 25th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

 Read comments or post a comment...

April 25th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Video #3: Did God Create the Universe?

April 25th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

 Read comments or post a comment...

April 25th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Video #2: Morally Superior to God: Garden of Injustice & Misfortune

February 8th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

 Read comments or post a comment...

February 8th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Video #1: Agnostic or Atheist: What am I?

January 19th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

When confronted with the question “Does God or Do gods exist?” what answer comes to your mind?

Depending on your answer you will likely be able to categorize yourself with one of these following positions of belief: theist, deist, or atheist. Furthermore, you will be able to add on top of that position of belief a position of knowledge. There are two positions of knowledge which will be discussed here: being gnostic or being agnostic.
The most important thing to know is that the default atheist position is actually not a belief at all. It’s a “lack of belief.” Obviously this means that atheists do not have a belief in any gods. However, this does not imply that atheists believe no gods exist. I know that this might sound confusing, but let me illustrate this concept more clearly.

The aim of this video is to help you decide where you call on the spectrum. I will define the words dealing with the position of belief/disbelief first (A) Theism, Deism, and Atheism and then with the position of knowledge second (B) Gnostic and Agnostic. You will then be able to combine A + B together to understand your precise position on the existence of a god or gods.

http://youtu.be/epEQC4YZMS8

 Read comments or post a comment...

January 19th, 2012 by Confronting Ignorance.org

How to Confront the Ignorant

December 21st, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

When confronting ignorance, do so carefully. It’s good to be in-your-face with the facts, but try not to be mean about it. Many of us were once religious, indoctrinated, and led along a path of ignorance. When you stumble upon someone like our former selves, try not treat them as the “other” or an enemy. Treat them as a friend. You can help guide them, and provide the option to hear a few things which made you question your faith in delusion. Use good language, logic, reason, and facts. Don’t worry about getting emotional about it: leave that to them. Remember: it’s not the ignorant people themselves you are attacking, but the ignorance itself. Religion is a fair target for mockery, complete, utter, and total. So too, a person can be, as you may mock one of your closest friends (when don’t we tease a good friend?). But if mocking a religion or a person, try to leave a bit of wiggle room for them to get on your side. Leave room for them to open up their minds, rather than totally isolate them in a corner only to cry and confusedly pray to a non-existent deity. Think of yourself as one of very few people in a mental institute. Treat them as human beings… human beings who believe in a lie, and you must gently lead them away from that lie.

 Read comments or post a comment...

December 21st, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

What is Being Open-Minded?

December 21st, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

I had someone comment on my facebook page, seemingly challenging the idea (and in some ways, perhaps rightly so) that people with faith are more close-minded than atheists.  The comment by facebook user Ioannis Karayiannis on the following photo was this:

who says atheists are open minded

I found this was likely a non-atheist posting the question.  And a click on his/her profile proved me correct: what we are dealing with is an agnostic.

Although I must admit that it is very possible, even very likely, for atheists to be close-minded about certain things, I maintain that atheists are actually (for the most part) quite open-minded in the sense they are scientifically minded, or rather, they accept the claims made by science (ie. make a claim, show me the evidence, if it proves me wrong, I will change my mind).  Atheists do not accept gods or supernatural things for the very fact that we are open-minded.  We would rather await good evidence.  Yet the most natural and seemingly obvious conclusion humans seem to make is that everything was created.  That there is a God.  After all, aren’t we creators of things ourselves?  Don’t we father children?  So then maybe all life has a Father?  Doesn’t everything have to be created?  Why should we exist, only to die?  Why do good people suffer injustice?  It doesn’t make sense to our small human minds.

Once it made perfect sense to ancient people that the Earth was flat, or that the sun circled the Earth.  It still also seems to make “perfect” sense to some that God indeed created the heavens (which actually turned out to be space) and all life (which appears to have arisen on its own… without help from a supernatural creator).  Yet it actually takes an open mind to reject the concept of divine creation… to explore beyond the giant solid dome in the sky (which turned out to be atmosphere) and outside of the tiny holes which let in water from the ocean above (actually, we found out there are no holes, just atmosphere… and we figured out rain doesn’t come through holes from a non-existent ocean above the Earth).  We found this out not because we are close-minded, but because we are open minded and curious about the world.  And we no longer accept the model of the world described in the Old Testament (the firmament model).  Yet let’s say for a moment that if astronauts who left the Earth noticed that the Earth was, indeed, flat, then scientists would have to accept that based on new observations, the Earth is indeed flat.  New evidence can sway our minds.  Lack of evidence, or dubious claims, do not.

Atheists on the other hand are not so different from agnostics.  In fact, the term “agnostic” is misleading if used as middle ground between atheist and theist.  In effect, you can have gnostic theists and atheists or agnostic theists or atheists.  Gnostic means “to know” and agnostic means the opposite.  Some atheists may be gnostic (as in they absolutely claim to know there is no God or gods) but the majority seem to be open-minded that if presented with good irrefutable scientific evidence of God or gods we would accept religion.  For example, if a being with supernatural powers emerged on Earth, claimed to be Jesus, and could magically heal people, perform miracles, and agree to be tested by various scientists then it might be convincing to an atheist.  If scientists found a portal to heaven, or at least some way to communicate effectively with the dead, and this could all be scientifically proven and verified by independent research, then perhaps we’d be on to something.  If Jesus were accompanied by angelic beings who seemed to pop out from nothingness, then one might be convinced. As for myself, I think the likelihood of an all powerful Creator as described in the Bible being just as likely as the existence of the Roman gods, or the Hindu gods.  I view all religious claims equally because I was never raised in a religion.  But I remain open-minded to the possibility of a God.  Why?  Because I consider myself pretty darn absolutely-almost sure (as in 99.999%) that there is no Judeo-Christian God.  But who knows!  Maybe there is something more to our universe than we know.  But until I am provided with good evidence, there is no reason for me to accept the claims of just anyone.  So you can call me an agnostic atheist.  But that agnostic part of me is like 0.0001%.

Yet say if we were provided such evidence as I described above (a Jesus-like all-powerful super being).  Let’s say that a God-figure literally appeared on our Earth, or over our heads… or even in our minds… all at once.  Although some might find this evidence convincing of a God or gods, I personally would figure it more likely that it was an advanced alien species playing on humanity’s belief systems in order to gain control or power over us.  I would remain skeptical in that situation.  But that’s just me.

This is why religion is so over-rated for me.  It’s basically labeling things we do not understand, or are ignorant of, as supernatural.  It stops asking questions.  It says “these questions are so hard, so let’s make up the answer and pretend it is the correct answer.”  It leads us to say “this is the answer, so let’s give up, shrug our shoulders, and move on.”   In other words, it keeps our ignorance ignorant.  That’s not the way to progress humanity or to improve our living conditions.  That’s no way to add to the overall knowledge of humanity.  Asking questions is what humans do best.  Confronting ignorance is what we need to do now in order to maintain this build-up of knowledge.

Yes, it’s OK to be an open-minded atheist.  But try not to be so open-minded your brain falls out.

For more on open-mindedness, do check out this video by Qualia Soup.

 Read comments or post a comment...

December 21st, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Christopher Hitchens – Dead, but always to be remembered.

December 16th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

“Hitchens is the greatest living essayist in the English language.” – Christopher Buckley

Perhaps the most articulate atheist has died.  Christopher Hitchens, you will be missed.

 

 

 

 

 

 Read comments or post a comment...

December 16th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Higgs-Boson Particle Just Around the Corner?

December 13th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Looks like something is going on at CERN.  Personally, I think it will be equally interesting whether they find this hypothesized particle or not.  If they do indeed find it, it sure is a testament to how science works: you predict, you experiment, you get a result.  Yet if we do not find it, at least it will leave scientists with other options, other mysteries to solve, more research into the nature of the universe.

This is why I love science.  If you experiment, and your prediction turns out what you expect it to, then wow!  If you experiment, and you don’t get the results you thought you would get, it’s actually not really a negative at all.  You’ve just proved something right there: the lack of results.  Which is equally as exciting.  Why?   Because we are still learning what really makes up our universe.  What really makes things tick, what connects things together, what makes up you and me.

Uncovering reality is interesting. That’s what science does.

Check out the BBC’s articles:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16111562

The discovery of the Higgs Boson would undoubtedly be the biggest scientific breakthrough of the century so far.

Arguably, it would be the most important discovery since Crick and Watson worked out the structure of DNA nearly 60 years ago. On Tuesday, researchers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will say how close they are when they present the results from two of the experiments searching for the Higgs.

One thing is for sure, the researchers won’t have all the data they need to make a definitive statement that they have discovered the sub-atomic particle. But in the best-case scenario they may come very close.

More at the site.

And here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16116230

Scientists are expected on Tuesday to present preliminary evidence that the most coveted prize in particle physics – the Higgs boson – has been glimpsed.

While the Higgs is crucial to our understanding of the Universe, it has never been observed by experiments.

At a seminar here in Geneva, teams will present a progress report in their hunt for the tiny particle at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).

But the LHC has not recorded enough data to claim a formal discovery.

Finding the Higgs was a key goal for the $10bn (£6bn) particle smasher. The collider hosts two experiments – Atlas and CMS – that are searching for the particle independently.

There is intense excitement among physicists working at Cern, the Geneva-based organisation which operates the collider, over hints that the hunters have cornered their quarry.

“It is a fantastic time at the moment, you can feel people are enthusiastic,” Dr Christoph Rembser, a senior scientist on the Atlas experiment, told BBC News. “It is really very lively.”

Prof Stefan Soldner-Rembold, from the University of Manchester, called the quality of the LHC’s results “exceptional”, adding: “Within one year we will probably know whether the Higgs particle exists, but it is likely not going to be a Christmas present.”

He told me: “The Higgs particle would, of course, be a great discovery, but it would be an even greater discovery if it didn’t exist where theory predicts it to be.”

Read more at the site.

 

 Read comments or post a comment...

December 13th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Noah’s Ark (not) found! — Again!

December 13th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

For my fundamentalist Christian readers — don’t get too excited just yet.  There has been a seemingly yearly tradition of claiming to find the mythical Noah’s Ark — and none of them ever pan out. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searches_for_Noah%27s_Ark )

Why don’t they ever pan out, you ask?  Well, considering that the ark would have been full to the brim just with the bajillions of insect species on Earth, and that the water on Earth would have been so high to cover Mount Ararat (where did all that water go?  just disappeared?), and that the logistics of finding far-away habitat-specific animals (easy examples: penguins in Antarctica, and polar bears at the north pole) and then transporting them to the Middle East, and after the flood, transporting them back all to their original habitats (assuming the animals would probably die in the completely different Middle Eastern habitat unfamiliar to them)… not to mention the space required for carrying all kinds of foods for every species of animal on Earth (which would include species specific foods — like Eucalyptus for Koalas).  And how about the big land mammals?  Elephants eat approximately 125 to 175 pounds of food per day.  … oh, and of course, for the more hardcore Christians, keeping T-Rex and Albertosaurus from eating each other… — The sheer size of plant-eating dinosaurs is another logistics problem — how would a small family catch even one?  How could they stow away so much food for these gigantic creatures?  Even the small insects, such as butterflies, would be rather difficult to catch.  Not to mention you would have to catch approximately all 20,000 species of butterflies, many of which are habitat-specific.  Transporting hornet nests, bees nests, and such could be tricky too.  Where would the garden of flowers be for the honeybees?  On top of this, nobody seems to remember that Noah would have to had made sure all the parasites found within every species on Earth was also preserved inside the bodies of the animals.

Oh, and this was all done by ONE family!  Amazing.  Just take a moment and realize how impossibly difficult it would be for the scientists, biologists, and engineers on Earth TODAY to preserve every life form on Earth, keep them safe from a flood for almost an entire year (according to some Christians — some claim that it was 40 days, but the actual amount of time in the ark is a subject which is disagreed upon — remember, the Bible says the rain lasted 40 days and 40 nights).  Even the Bible itself cannot figure out how long the flood was.  Even with modern day technology and innovation, it would surely be nearly impossible for a gigantic team of people to somehow save all species on Earth from a 40+ day flood.

For more on how Noah’s Ark is completely impossible go to Talk Origins and read up on the article there: Problems with a Global Flood.  I would like to point out here that it’s possible the story of Noah’s flood comes from a true story about a farmer escaping a localized flood where he had to put all of his possessions, farm animals, family, etc. in a boat.  Further, since flooding is such a common catastrophe and happens multiple times in different regions in the world (humans tend to live near water) it is no surprise that this basic story is repeated all throughout the world among various cultures.  See the huge list of various flood myths.  Does this mean there really was one huge flood?  Or does this mean several cultures around the world, several people have experienced floods and all created stories about them.  Well, I’ll let you choose which is more likely…

So yet again, we have another foolish person who believes in myths as fact trying to prove the existence of the Ark:

‘Overwhelming Evidence’ of Noah’s Ark Discovery Featured on Website

A website is suggesting that the remains of the biblical Noah’s Ark have been found near the summit of Mt. Ararat in Turkey, and the research team’s project leader has published a number of scientific articles claiming the legitimacy of the discovery.

If you read the story from Christian Post, wow, it sure sounds believable doesn’t it!  But — wait a moment — this website just might be a little biased.  These claims have been going on for a while now — this MSNBC article is from 2004.  There were also concerns about the team chosen for the task:

The choice of expedition leader—a Turkish academic named Ahmet Ali Arslan, who claims to have climbed Mount Ararat 50 times in 40 years—also raised a red flag with those familiar with previous expeditions.

(Neither McGivern nor Arslan responded to requests by National Geographic News for interviews for this story.)

Arslan was involved in a 1993 documentary, aired on CBS television, which claimed to have found the ark. Some of the evidence presented in that documentary turned out to be a hoax, raising concerns about Arslan’s testimony.

I have to agree with the National Geographic article:

Some archaeologists charge that Noah’s-ark expeditions like McGivern’s are nothing but wild-goose chases. Even if the ark existed, these scholars argue, it is unlikely that the wood from the boat would still be preserved today, thousands of years later. Moving ice is likely to have swept away any wooden structure, experts say.

“These expeditions are a waste of time, energy, and money—all of which could be put to much better use by supporting existing scholarly excavations around the world,” said Eric Cline, a historian and archaeologist at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

There doesn’t seem to be any plan on actually looking at the supposedly ‘overwhelming’ evidence.  Even this Christian site is skeptical:

The team used military satellite imagery and ground penetrating radar technology to locate the ruins. They believe the large object is wooden.

“The evidence is overwhelming,” McGivern added. “This is the large piece from Noah’s ark.”

His evidence is based solely on imaging technology.

The large piece of wood will likely remain buried under ice.

“There’s a huge problem with getting down to it, because of the fact that you can’t melt the ice,” McGivern explained. “You are up there at 16,600 feet. How are you going to get down to it?”

For centuries, explores have searched Mount Ararat for the ark.

Just last year, a Chinese team claimed to have found the historical boat — releasing a video showing men inside what appeared to be ancient wooden structures.

The video and find was widely believed to be a hoax.

McGivern’s claim may never have the hard evidence to back it up, but the discovery could provide a great opportunity to share the gospel.

Yeah.  They may never have the hard evidence (convenient!) so let’s just go back to reading the Bible!

 

 

 

 Read comments or post a comment...

December 13th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

This is Child Abuse

December 12th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org

Seriously – Take a moment to imagine what this poor girl must go through. Think of her brothers, and the wife of that man. He is preaching, saying things like “Women should not be allowed to vote.” He is preaching hate. Now imagine if that man was your father, and you were a young child of his. This girl is going through a traumatic experience — life must be very confusing for her. So now, please, take a moment, think about her, and spread this image around. This is a form of child abuse.

 Read comments or post a comment...

December 12th, 2011 by Confronting Ignorance.org